ACM
Home Page

Publications

High Frequency Excitation

Background

Related
Links

Operational
Sites

Micro-Meter Crack Response Book

Construction
Vibrations Book

Vibrations
FAQ

NUVIB 2

Listserv

Contact Us

 

Newsletter Archive

February 2019 Newsletter #1:
Identification of data points associated with the establishment of the Z curve.
C.H. Dowding PDF
March 2019 Newsletter #2:
Details of older, distressed structures whose cosmetic cracking define the lower bound of the Z curve.
C.H. Dowding PDF
April 2019 Newsletter #3:
Linkage of the Z curve with response spectra demonstrates its consistency with the principles of structural dynamics.
C.H. Dowding PDF
May 2019 Newsletter #4:
Reasons for the boundaries and corners of the Z curve in RI 8507.
C.H. Dowding PDF
June 2019 Newsletter #5:
Nuances of choosing the pulse velocity and frequency to populate the Z curve and use of zero crossing to determine frequency
C.H. Dowding PDF
November 2019 Newsletter #6:
Threshold or Cosmetic, Hair Sized Cracks Form the Basis of Vibration Control limits
C.H. Dowding PDF
November 2019 Newsletter #7:
Probability of blast induced cracking below 12.7 mm/s (0.5 ips) is zero
C.H. Dowding PDF
January 2020 Newsletter #8:
Concrete, brick, and concrete masonry unit (CMU) portions of structures are stronger than plaster and gypsum drywall
C.H. Dowding PDF
February 2020 Newsletter #9:
Not even repetitive vibration at 12.7 mm/s (0.5 ips) can produce cosmetic cracking
C.H. Dowding PDF
March 2020 Newsletter #10:
Vibrating Roller Excitation of Residential Structures Produces Limited Numbers of Localized Peak Responses
C.H. Dowding PDF
April 2020 Newsletter #11:
Crack Response of Nevada Test House to Vibrations Induced by Construction Equipment Verifies Conservatism of Limits for Continuous Cyclic Excitation
C.H. Dowding PDF
May 2020 Newsletter #12:
Dynamic excitation of full scale CMU walls establishes a global strain criterion for cosmetic cracking by repetitive cyclic loading
C.H. Dowding PDF
June 2020 Newsletter #13:
Use of Response Spectra and Principles of Structural Dynamics to Verify the Shape of the Z Curve and to Supply Guidance for Future Research
C.H. Dowding PDF
July 2020 Newsletter #14:
Extensive Search for Cosmetic Cracks Induced by Low Frequency Excitation Results in Observation of Only Two Cosmetic Cracks at PPV's above 12.7 mm/s (0.5 ips)
C.H. Dowding PDF
September 2020 Newsletter #15:
Use of Pseudo Velocity Response Spectra (PVRS) to Assess Possible Cases of Increased Probability of Cosmetic Cracking
C.H. Dowding PDF
November 2020 Newsletter #16:
Long-term or climatologically-induced crack response overwhelms vibratory response both at ordinary and high vibration levels as well
C.H. Dowding PDF
December 2020 Newsletter #17:
Micro-meter crack response verifies zero probability of cracking below peak particle velocities of 12.7 mm/s (0.5ips)
C.H. Dowding PDF
January 2021 Newsletter #18:
Use New NUVIB 2.1 User Manual to Calculate Response Spectra from Seismograph Data Files and Strains from Velocity Response Time Histories. Also Visit the Revitalized ACM Website to Explore Its New Content
C.H. Dowding PDF
January 2021 Newsletter #19a:
Scaled Distance Relationships in 8507 and the Origin of the High Confidence Equation PPV = 438(ft/W1/2) -1.52
C.H. Dowding PDF
January 2021 Newsletter #19b:
Challenges of use of standard log-log presentation of measured decay or attenuation of peak particle velocity with scaled distance
C.H. Dowding PDF
January 2021 Table 1 of RI 8507
C.H. Dowding PDF
February 2021 Newsletter #20:
Full Scale Field Testing of Buried Pipe Integrity Demonstrates that a Variety of Steel Pipe Sizes Can Withstand Peak Particle Velocities Well Above 125 mm/s
C.H. Dowding PDF
March 2021 Newsletter #21:
Stresses in compliant (flexible) pipes can be calculated from peak particle velocities based upon the assumption that pipe and plane wave ground strains are equal
C.H. Dowding PDF
July 2021 Newsletter #22:
Smaller diameter pipes with smaller flexibility ratios behave in a manner similar to those with larger diameters and larger flexibility ratios
C.H. Dowding PDF
August 2021 Newsletter #23:
Stresses in Buried Pipe with Large Diameter to Thickness Ratios Can Be Calculated from Ground Strains for Comparison with Allowable Levels of Specified Minimum Yield Stress (SMYS)
C.H. Dowding PDF
October 2021 Newsletter #24:
Whenever Blasting Occurs Closer Than Two Blast Hole Depths (within crater zone) Explosive Gas Pressure Induced Rock Block Movement Becomes a Major Concern
C.H. Dowding PDF
November 2021 Newsletter #25:
Allowable Peak Particle Velocities for Segmental Pipe through Limitation of Angular Rotation and Compressive Stresses in Pipe Joints
C.H. Dowding PDF
December 2021 Newsletter #26:
Employing USBM RI 8507 Recommendations for Assessing the Possibility of Cosmetic Cracking in Engineered Structures
C.H. Dowding PDF
January 2022 Newsletter #27:
Measurement of Occupant Induced Crack Response Shows Larger Incidence of Occupant Induced than Blast-Induced Events
C.H. Dowding PDF
February 2022 Newsletter #28:
Importance of Yearly Cycles of Crack Response and An Extreme Weather or Occupant Induced Event that Caused a Cosmetic Crack
C.H. Dowding PDF
February 2022 Newsletter #29:
Inclusion of Amplitude in Calculation of the Probability of Occurrence of a Dynamic Event during the Single, Yearly Period of Vulnerability
C.H. Dowding PDF
March 2022 Newsletter #30:
Measurement of both Occupant- and Blast- Induced Crack Response Allows Calculations of their Relative Probabilities of Exceeding the Maximum Yearly Crack Response
C.H. Dowding PDF
April 2022 Newsletter #31:
Earthquakes Differ by Orders of Magnitude from Construction Vibrations in Energy, Dominant Frequency and Waveform
C.H. Dowding PDF
May 2022 Newsletter #32:
Peak Ground Motions Produced by Earthquakes and Construction Depend upon Energy and Distance from the Source
C.H. Dowding PDF
June 2022 Newsletter #33:
Both Earthquake and Construction Vibration Design Spectra Are Based on Strain from Relative Displacement Response
C.H. Dowding PDF
July 2022 Newsletter #34:
Large Urban Structures Respond Little to Blast Induced High Particle Velocities with Ultra High Dominant Frequencies
C.H. Dowding PDF
August 2022 Newsletter #35:
Measurements of Low Relative Displacements and Deamplification with Ultra High Frequency Excitation Validate Use of Single Degree of Freedom and Impulse Models
C.H. Dowding PDF
September 2022 Newsletter #36:
Non-synchronous Excitation & Differences in Ratios of Wavelength to Structure Size Can Lead to Differences in Type of Response for Large Urban and Residential Structures
C.H. Dowding PDF
October 2022 Newsletter #37:
Structural Strains Induced in Large Urban Structures by High Frequency Excitation Pulses Are Small when Calculated from Time Correlated Velocity Time Histories of Structural Response
C.H. Dowding PDF
November 2022 Newsletter #38:
Response of Three Story (Three Degree of Freedom) Model Shows that the Highest Strains Are Produced by Excitation Motions at the Fundamental (Natural) Frequency
C.H. Dowding PDF
December 2022 Newsletter #39:
Successful Blasting Within Grand Central Station Train Shed New York City. NY
C.H. Dowding PDF
January 2023 Newsletter #40:
High Particle Velocities at Ultra High Frequencies Do Not Produce High Strains
C.H. Dowding PDF
February 2023 Newsletter #41:
Rapid attenuation of column strains with distance shows that large urban structures like the train shed and buildings along Park Ave. are not coherently or synchronously excited by high frequency blast excitation
C.H. Dowding PDF